No, 95% of AI Pilots Aren't Failing

The Myth That Shook Wall Street

You've seen it everywhere: “95% of AI pilots are failing.”

That stat, from an MIT Project Nanda study, went viral. Investors panicked. Analysts called it proof that the AI bubble was about to burst.

But here's the problem: the number doesn’t hold up.

• 52 executives, 150 surveys. That’s not a representative sample of enterprise AI.
• Slippery definitions. “Failure” often meant “no public press release about ROI.”
• Biased pool. Half of reported spend went to sales and marketing, not a balanced view of AI adoption.
• Shadow AI ignored. MIT admitted that while 40% of companies had official AI subscriptions, 90% of employees were already using AI tools daily.

This study didn’t prove AI doesn’t work. It proved that organizations are struggling to implement it.

Why Pilots Actually Fail

Most failed pilots don’t fail because the tech doesn’t work. They fail because the organization wasn’t ready.

• No executive sponsorship. Innovation groups without CEO-level buy-in get stuck.
• No team buy-in. Employees resist when they think AI equals layoffs.
• No problem–value fit. Cool demo, but no KPI to move.
• No baselines. Success gets measured in vibes, not data.
• Data and workflow gaps. AI can't automate undocumented or inaccessible processes.
• No enablement. Employees aren’t trained in how to actually use the tools.
• Risk and fragmentation. Disconnected pilots, compliance overreach, vendor lock-in.

The pattern is clear: 80% of failures come from organizational issues, not technology.

What Makes Pilots Succeed

When AI pilots work, they don’t just succeed, they scale.

• ✅ Leadership and team alignment. Execs set the vision, employees see the benefit.
• ✅ Clear ROI targets. Pilots tie directly to cost savings, efficiency, or revenue lift.
• ✅ Baselines and measurement. Dashboards prove before and after results.
• ✅ Enterprise context. AI gets access to the right data in the right formats.
• ✅ Change management. Adoption is supported, not forced.
• ✅ Strategic sequencing. Quick wins build momentum into big swings.

AI works when it’s treated as a transformation, not a toy.

Proof in the Market

• KPMG found that organizations with strong top-down adoption strategies see a 2.6x higher success rate than those with piecemeal efforts.
• Blitz is powering enterprise engineering with thousands of AI agents, helping public companies achieve 5x faster development cycles.
• Across industries, the companies investing in data readiness, enablement, and change management are the ones moving from pilot to durable advantage.

The New Clarity Approach

We don’t buy the “95% failure” myth. We’ve seen AI succeed when it's done with purpose.

That’s why every engagement at New Clarity starts with our AI Audit and Change Management Process:

1. Audit. We map your processes, data, and readiness. Identify the highest-ROI use cases. Establish baselines.
2. Roadmap. Quick wins first, then big swings. Sequenced for compounding ROI.
3. Change Management. Align leadership and teams, build enablement, and make adoption stick.

Bottom Line

AI isn't failing. Poor planning is.

If your org is serious about AI, don’t chase headlines. Ask the real question:

Do we have the roadmap and alignment to make AI stick?

‍